Quotes

I can’t imag­ine using any of these [wear­able tech] items—mostly because they’re techy look­ing, and not in that sleek, sexy way, but more in a mas­cu­line, rub­bery, will-ruin-my-out­fit way.

Peo­ple have asked me many times to say what, exact­ly, is the point of this project. I’ve always had a fas­ci­na­tion with the ways that cre­ative peo­ple bal­ance inspi­ra­tion and dis­ci­pline in their work­ing lives. It’s easy to be ener­gized when you’re in the grip of a big idea. But what do you do when you don’t have any­thing to work with? Just stay in bed? Writ­ers have this fig­ured out: it’s amaz­ing how many of them have a rigid rou­tine. John Cheev­er, for instance, used to wake up every morn­ing in his New York City apart­ment, put on a jack­et and tie, kiss his wife good­bye, and take the ele­va­tor down to his apart­ment building’s base­ment, when he would sit at a small desk and write until quit­ting time, at which point he’d go back up. (When it was hot in the base­ment, he’d strip down to his under­wear to work.) The only way to expe­ri­ence this kind of dis­ci­pline is to sub­ject your­self to it. Every stu­dent who has tak­en this project had a moment where the work turned into a mind-numb­ing grind. And trust me: it won’t be the first time this hap­pens. The trick is to press on. For each new day (whether it’s Day 28, Day 61, even Day 100) brings with it the hope of inspiration.

Sci­ence” is a ful­ly his­tor­i­cal prod­uct of the reg­i­men­ta­tion, orga­ni­za­tion, and pro­fes­sion­al­iza­tion of what used to just be peo­ple observ­ing the world and think­ing about it. Sci­ence is the trans­for­ma­tion of knowl­edge into a cliquish guild.

Neolib­er­al­ism has made geeks of us all: jocks, nerds, and dweebs alike. In the back­ground are the cor­po­rate own­ers of the media which geeks love, set­ting man against woman, rich against poor, black and brown against white, all on man­u­fac­tured lines of consumption.

The future of Bit­coin min­ing appears to be in the hands of a small minor­i­ty of users who can afford ASIC equip­ment, mak­ing the “dis­trib­uted” nature of Bit­coin some­thing of a joke. In addi­tion, the Bit­coin net­work now must use vast amounts of pow­er just to main­tain itself, pow­er typ­i­cal­ly gen­er­at­ed by fos­sil fuel plants and in amounts far out of pro­por­tion to its actu­al use­ful­ness. It is a tremen­dous waste of actu­al real-world resources that could be bet­ter used on some­thing impor­tant (like, for exam­ple, watch­ing cat videos).

If your work­space is as leg­i­ble as, and aes­thet­i­cal­ly con­sis­tent with, your busi­ness card, you should sus­pect your­self of liv­ing a frilly life. If it is sig­nif­i­cant­ly more illeg­i­ble and aes­thet­i­cal­ly inco­her­ent, there’s a good chance your work­space is a space of real work.

A frill is nei­ther an obvi­ous­ly non-func­tion­al aes­thet­ic touch (that would be a flour­ish) nor a clear­ly unnec­es­sary func­tion­al capa­bil­i­ty (that would be wast­ed func­tion­al­i­ty). Rather, it is a func­tion­al capa­bil­i­ty you want to sig­nal as being a part of your life, but not actu­al­ly use.

Gov­ern­ment researchers have tagged 338 sharks with acoustic trans­mit­ters that mon­i­tor where the ani­mals are. When a tagged shark is about half a mile away from a beach, it trig­gers a com­put­er alert, which tweets out a mes­sage on the Surf Life Sav­ing West­ern Aus­tralia Twit­ter feed. The tweet notes the shark’s size, breed and approx­i­mate location.

Mis­tak­ing cap­i­tal­ism for a blue­print as to how to build a soci­ety strikes me as a real­ly dan­ger­ous idea in a bad way. Cap­i­tal­ism is a remark­able engine again for pro­duc­ing wealth. It’s a great tool to have in your tool­box if you’re try­ing to build a soci­ety and have that soci­ety advance. You wouldn’t want to go for­ward at this point with­out it. But it’s not a blue­print for how to build the just soci­ety. There are oth­er met­rics besides that quar­ter­ly prof­it report.

I’m utter­ly com­mit­ted to the idea that cap­i­tal­ism has to be the way we gen­er­ate mass wealth in the com­ing cen­tu­ry. That argument’s over. But the idea that it’s not going to be mar­ried to a social com­pact, that how you dis­trib­ute the ben­e­fits of cap­i­tal­ism isn’t going to include every­one in the soci­ety to a rea­son­able extent, that’s aston­ish­ing to me.