Month: October 2009

Bleecker and Nova argue for an alternative to the synchronous, real-time city. I can definitely get behind the idea that there is more to city experience than the hygienic, computational model that is currently being imposed by technologists. Also, the examples they show from their own practice are inspiring works that demonstrate the value of thinking through making.

An interesting take by urbanists on urban games: “The big issue of urban games is the sudden appearance of unexpected actions within an urban context. The public space is reset and reinterpreted as a playground for adults. The disturbing role that those games have on ‘normal’ space use, seems to be the main purpose. In the context of the flexible city the games show the need of another perception of space. Organisers must be sick of formal city forms and legislative terms of use. The city has to become fun again, not as a playing field for civil servants making plans, but for people using it.” The whole blog seems worth following actually, if you’re interested in new forms of city planning.

A Dutch article on the state of the serious games industry. A pretty decent overview, with just a few minor inaccuracies: Surgeons who practice using Trauma Center on the Wii? Not likely. Also, it’s a shame the researcher of TU Delft who is quoted says games need to have appealing visual design, but neglects to mention the importance of proper game play design…

Paper is a wonderful ‘platform’ for social games at conferences. Here’s another example of a game idea involving sneakiness.

What a wonderful resource for physical games designers: quote after quote from diverse sources that illustrate uses of touch across cultures and times. Via Mr. Webb.

“Social means showing off and sharing, and politeness and play, yes. But social also means healthier, wealthier and happier, and that’s a big, big deal. I believe that’s why social matters.”

The guys at BUROPONY have started blogging. This first post outlining some of the thinking behind their own identity is a nice example of their approach to things: based on crafting physical materials and playfulness.

Chris quotes Bridget Riley on sketching who in turn quotes Stravinsky on constraints.

Starting small, making sure participating is worthwhile to the first few, all things that seem so logical but are so easy to forget once you’re deep into something.

Although I see a lot to agree with here (providing access to city data is a good thing). I can’t help but wince at the techno-optimism oozing from this piece. The author seems to think the average citizen is fluent in datamanipulation. Geeks are also flocking to this city as a platform stuff because it’s shiny new tech. But they’re forgetting about all the mundane infrastructures regular people are already dealing with, and need help with, which the techno-elite have forgotten about, since, well, it’s gotten bored with it.

I think Timo and Jack have made a lovely film, and they’re obviously on to something. But it’s design for designers, and I’d love to see them do design for, well, the rest of the world.

An interesting site (thanks Iskander), very much related to my ideas on using urban games to create positive effects in public space. The tagline though, is misleading: “something as simple as fun is the easiest way to change people’s behaviour for the better”. Beyond gimmicks, fun is neither a simple concept to understand, nor a simple experience to bring about.