-
Had a chat with some of the guys behind this company at ThoughtMade. They showed a bit of patterned foil that you could print and stick on a regular screen, making it work with their digital pens. A cheap way (compared to Wacom’s Cintiq, for instance) to make big screens with pen based interactions.
-
Ran into the people behind FIELD last friday, who were in Copenhagen to present this video that was commissioned by Netfilmmakers Gallery: “In their video Muse, FIELD is remixing their private digital scrapbooks from the last 3 years. A flood of inspiring images and references is transformed into an ocean of colour, fuelled from Evernote, our blog field.io/process, our favourites on Google Reader and Flickr, and other sources.”
-
““The use of certain products, such as kites, mountain bikes and GPS monitors, has a bearing on the way in which landscape is understood.” The landscape is instrumentalized, we might say, distilled through dense layers of technological abstraction to become, once again, a place inhabitable by human activity, however pathetic or impressively persistent it might be.” Which more or less sums up what I find so fascinating about working in new urban development areas such as Leidsche Rijn. To see if there are ways to transform in between spaces into social places for play.
-
“The New Weird has come into being, such as it is and whatever it should be, on its own and not by dint of any decision or program, so the attribution of decisions and schemes to it ought to be seen as prescriptions rather than as descriptions.” This passage, from a slightly confusing essay on the contemporary literary fantasy scene, got me thinking about discussions about interaction design and this exact kind of confusion that often happens. People expressing a hope or a wish about it, but presenting it as an objective fact. Whereas, for instance, what we are trying to do with This happened is to just show the work and in doing so, just describe what is going on.