<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links for 2007-04-06</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leapfrog.nl/blog/archives/2007/04/06/links-for-2007-04-06/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leapfrog.nl/blog/archives/2007/04/06/links-for-2007-04-06/</link>
	<description>design, cities, physical &#38; social interaction, play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:41:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kars</title>
		<link>http://leapfrog.nl/blog/archives/2007/04/06/links-for-2007-04-06/comment-page-1/#comment-28878</link>
		<dc:creator>Kars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 09:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leapfrog.nl/archives/2007/04/06/links-for-2007-04-06/#comment-28878</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure! Time will tell I guess, but it is important that design schools start focussing on this area I think. My impression is that interaction design at the HKU is a very broad course (which is good). The problem is that because of that broadness the urgency of educating designers to start considering the effects of ubicomp is not made clear enough. This new course might address that issue. I&#039;m actually having my game design students consider what it means to design &lt;em&gt;games&lt;/em&gt; in a ubicomp world. That&#039;s going to be fun...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure! Time will tell I guess, but it is important that design schools start focussing on this area I think. My impression is that interaction design at the HKU is a very broad course (which is good). The problem is that because of that broadness the urgency of educating designers to start considering the effects of ubicomp is not made clear enough. This new course might address that issue. I&#8217;m actually having my game design students consider what it means to design <em>games</em> in a ubicomp world. That&#8217;s going to be fun&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacco</title>
		<link>http://leapfrog.nl/blog/archives/2007/04/06/links-for-2007-04-06/comment-page-1/#comment-28877</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 08:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leapfrog.nl/archives/2007/04/06/links-for-2007-04-06/#comment-28877</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I saw the new coarse on experience design at the HKU a while ago... And I&#039;m curious, do you think there&#039;s room for such a study at the HKU?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the new coarse on experience design at the HKU a while ago&#8230; And I&#8217;m curious, do you think there&#8217;s room for such a study at the HKU?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
